Tags: * for easy opt-out
" - Opting out of reviewing should be possible with no reason required but still requires action on
behalf of authors. - ""Use a rolling review system for reviews and meta-reviews, with explicit instructions
to write them as if this paper is being considered for one of the major conferences"" unclear how this
differs from ""Use ARR as originally designed, where reviews and meta-reviews discuss strengths and
weaknesses of papers without a specific venue in mind"". Neither seems to suggest a specific venue.
The main difference I see here is that reviewers either have a single binary decision ""accept/reject""
base on the bench-mark of a major conference, or in the second case the reviewers have a three-way decision
""accept-conference/accept-workshop/reject""."