Tags: * charge submission fees * for FTE * financial rewards for good reviewers and authors
"The academic publication system still has a critical flow. => Non-student (co-)authors must be asked
to pay for processing/reviewing their submissions. This will have several benefits, among which: - funding
the FTEs to manage the reviewing infrastructure, and the infra itself. - put a cost on (fictitious)
co-authors (and non-contributing team leads/managers) - incentivize the best reviewers with rewards
- incentivize the best authors with best paper awards - Reduce the number of low quality submissions
that are heavily relying on reviewing randomness to act in their favor. "