Tags: * for longer cycles * utility of revise-and-resubmit unclear
"- Review cycle should be longer than a month. It is a significant workload some months and mostly done
in the free time of the reviewers. - The utility of the reviewing process should be clearer. As the
mayor conferences still have their own deadlines, this process feels like just continual improvement
of the works, but with limited impact on the final publication of the papers."