Tags: * abolish anonymity policy * time from submission to acceptance is too long * improve matching
"As an author: The whole review period plus decision by a venue is too long. It took around half a year
for one paper of mine to receive the final decision. This is bad when there is even an anonymous period.
I personally don't like the anonymous period either, which seems to encourage authors to submit a rough
version before the period, while for ML conferences (NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR) I can submit to arxiv after
much more revision. As a reviewer: Since using ARR, I observe an obvious decline in the quality of papers
assigned to me for review, which is disappointing to me. One issue is that there is no bidding, and
the assignment is often not very good. And maybe there are more papers who are not originally qualified
for ACL/EMNLP/NAACL but are still submitting to ARR (for other purposes such as workshop?). "