Tags: * link meta/reviews to acceptance * make ARR the sole submission system
"- I think that the outcome of the ARR review process should be two-fold: (1) the paper is accepted
or not (e.g. publishing it in the ACL journal) and (2) the meta-reviewer/area chair (if the authors
wanted to) propose the paper to be presented publicly (= the meta-reviewer itself takes the decision
about this, not the authors) - there shouldn't be other options than ARR for submitting to conferences
(this double system just puts more pressure on reviewers)"